RE: [ebxml-bp] UN/CEFACT 1.1 BPSS XML Schema

[Sacha Schlegel <sacha_oasis@schlegel.li>]

Hi Jean-Jacques

Thanks for your clarification.

On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 23:37, Jean-Jacques Dubray wrote:
> Sacha:
> 
> Here are the BTA attributes coming fromt the schema that was submitted
> by the BPSS editorial team to M. Naujok on August 19 2003. I believe
> that the BTA definition is correct (subtype of BusinessActivity).
> 

I think they (attributes of BusinessActivity type) are in the actual
BPSS 1.1 XML Schema file but not in the ebXML BPSS 1.1 pdf document as
XML Schema source.

If someone is looking for the BPSS 1.1 XML Schema File they probably
find the XML Schema file (including the BusinessActivity data type) and
dont have to get the XML Schema source from the BPSS 1.1 pdf document.

Kind regards.

Sacha

> Best regards,
> 
> Jean-Jacques
> tel: 425-649-6584
> Cell: 508-333-7634
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sacha Schlegel [mailto:sacha_oasis@schlegel.li]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:06 AM
> To: ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ebxml-bp] UN/CEFACT 1.1 BPSS XML Schema
> 
> Hi bp team
> 
> A follow up to me previous email.
> 
> Looking at the UN/CEFACT 1.1 BPSS XML Schema I am not sure if there
> are missing things.
> 
> Maybe someone can comment on section 6.1.8:
> 
> 6.1.8 element BusinessTransactionActivity
> 
> The "BusinessTransactionActivity" element gets introduced and a list
> of attributes are shown. In fact 15 attributes (name, nameID,
> fromRole, fromRoleIDREF, beginsWhen, endsWhen, preCondition,
> postCondition, businessTransaction, businessTransactionIDREF,
> isConcurrent, isLegallyBinding, timeToPerform).
> 
> The source shows that the BusinessTransactionActivity element is an
> extension of BusinessActivity and thus does not define all attributes
> but the new ones (I guess).
> 
> BUT I cannot find BusinessActivity XML element in the XML schema. The
> Specification says in 6.2 "The following classes in the UML
> specification schema are abstract, and do not have an element
> equivalent in theSchema. Only their concrete subtypes are in the
> Schema" and lists BusinessActivity there.
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> I only have the UN/CEFACT 1.1 specification at hand but not the real
> XML Schema file.
> 
> Kind regards.
> 
> Sacha
> 
> --
> ------------------------------------------------
> Sacha                                   Schlegel
> ------------------------------------------------
> 4 Warwick Str, 6102 St. James, Perth,  Australia
> sacha@schlegel.li                www.schlegel.li
> public key:            www.schlegel.li/sacha.gpg
> ------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:3fbce061218011101194285!
-- 
------------------------------------------------
Sacha                                   Schlegel
------------------------------------------------
4 Warwick Str, 6102 St. James, Perth,  Australia
sacha@schlegel.li                www.schlegel.li
public key:            www.schlegel.li/sacha.gpg
------------------------------------------------