[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [ebBP] 4/8/2004: WI-23 Logical Business Documents Update [RSD]
Discussion|OASIS.ebBP.WI23-Business document and envelope; Topic; Attachment|http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200403/msg00085.html; Point|Impact to CPPA Negotiation; mm1@ I've included the original summary I provided in late March 2004 for reference. |References previously cited: ||Attachment|http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200402/msg00035.html; ||Attachment|http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200403/msg00002.html; ||Attachment|http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200403/msg00085.html; Email summary of 26 March 2004 ||Attachment|http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200403/msg00002.html;_ Martin Roberts draft schema_ Reference: Work Item 23 Business document and envelope with more than one document Description: Investigate how to handle a business document and envelope with more than one structured document. Originally we discussed giving the same structure to an attachment that occurs with a business document. We also would provide additional capabilities to identify a document including a specificationType. I met with the CPPA Negotiation team briefly today to discuss WI 23 and our assumptions around attachments. Here are a few CPPA negotiation specifics: * CPPA negotiation does not require BPSS. * CPPA negotiation would use a logical business document (initial or counter offer). * The CPPA negotiation also has the Negotiation Descriptor Document (NDD) and a potential CPPA template. Note that these documents may be included in the business message or by reference. Given these specifics, we still need to determine, more about the attachments. We still have some open questions that affect CPPA and ebBP: * Looking at the CPPA negotiation use case, is the initial offer, business document negotiated prior to its inclusion with the CPPA template and NDD or their references? Basically, is the business document part of the initial offer or pre-negotiated? * Are attachments first class documents? The CPPA negotiation 'documents' appear to be secondary to the initial/counter offer unless we or they assume a different premise based on question above). * Are they included? Can we support both include or reference? * Are they required? Does their reference change whether or not they are required? * Can they affect the business process? In the case of CPPA negotiation, I believe they do. * Is a WSDL definition for attachments required? Note, that simple SOAP does not use other attachments which raises the question of if multiple-part package (document and attachments) are composed. I have asked the CPPA negotiation team to review this question against the ebBP proposal and provide responses. I think this would be a key item to discuss with CPPA team as they meet after we do at the OASIS symposium. I presume we will discuss this item at the beginning of their session as they are in the same room and will be using our speaker phone :-P . *I am awaiting your comments !!!! **This will be on the agenda for 19 April 2004 call.*** @mm1
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]