[ebBP] 5/31/2004: Vote Opens for WI-44-57 [RSD]

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

OASIS.ebBP.WI-44-57-Use of Whitespace and Constraints;
Topic|;
Point|Quorum vote opened 31 May 2004;
Attachment|http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200405/msg00146.html; 


mm1@
The quorum vote for WI-44-57 opened 31 May 2004 and will continue until 
8 June 2004.

Original Work Item 44 and 57:
Constraints on white space - Should constraints be placed on the use of 
xsd:string in usage in BPSS or left to implementation and deployment?
Define what facets, if any should be used on the data types used on all 
or specific BPSS elements. In XSD, the xsd:string can use preserve, 
collapse and replace whitespace facets to ensure consistency. What 
should the BPSS use?

Vote Question WI-44-57:
=============================================================================================== 

Do you agree that:

No constraints SHOULD be placed on the xsd: string. These constraints 
SHOULD be handled by an implementation detail, and if found to err, 
raise an error.

The technical specification SHOULD provide a warning or implementor's 
hint about this possible condition. If appropriate, this hint SHOULD be 
referenced in descriptive text in the technical specification and any 
well-formedness rules referenced that may assist in ease of development.
======================================================================================== 

References:
Summary proposal for vote: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200405/msg00146.html

@mm1