Re: [ebxml-bp] Business Transaction definition

[David RR Webber <david@drrw.info>]

Yano,

Are you getting a schema validation error?  If so - which part of the 
XML below dos it not like?

Thanks, DW

YANO Keisuke (矢野啓介) wrote:

>Folks,
>
>Please let me put a question.  Can BPSS v2.0 allow a user to define
>the following Business Transaction valid for 1.01 and 1.05?
>
>The points are:
>  - using both receipt and acceptance acknowledgment signals
>  - without response
>
>  <BusinessTransaction name="BT:Invoice" nameID="bt-invoice">
>      <RequestingBusinessActivity
>          name="ReqBA:SendInvoice" nameID="reqba-invoice"
>          timeToAcknowledgeReceipt="PT6H"
>          timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance="PT12H">
>          <DocumentEnvelope name="DE:ProcessInvoice" nameID="de-invoice"
>              businessDocument="BD:ProcessInvoice"
>              businessDocumentIDRef="bd-invoice"/>
>      </RequestingBusinessActivity>
>      <RespondingBusinessActivity
>          name="ResBA:ReceiveInvoice" nameID="resba-invoice"/>
>  </BusinessTransaction>
>
>The answer for the question should be "yes".  However, it seems that
>the v2.0 draft schema is saying "no".
>
>If the answer is "yes", could anyone show an example of the BPSS 2.0
>instance fragment?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Yano Keisuke
>  
>