ebBP 4/5/2005: Comment re: Quality Attribute Group (wd10-schema 2/22)Updated

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

I received this comment from Hima Mukkamala and we can discuss in 
today's call. Note, there is a minor correction on Responding Business 
Activity for isAuthorizationRequired for Notification (cut-paste error). 
Thanks.

>Mukkamala: My comments
>
>1) Preference for security to move to quality attribute group.
>
>2) Regarding the single Document Envelope, this is a restriction
>only on the RequestingBusinessActivity. I don't mind
>creating a restriction xml element for RBA to have only
>one DocumentEnvelope for RBA. This may mean moving
>DocumentEnvelope out of BusinessAction Type.
>     =========================================================================                                                                      
>mm1: Please accept my apology in that Mozilla reformats what I sent. Please
>see the attachment. Thanks.
>
>[resend]
>Everyone,
>There has been more discussions and input regarding the quality and
>documentSecurity attribute groups.
>
>With inputs from Dale, John and others, I've developed a draft
>recommendation that I believe represents our discussions, scope and
>intent. I'd like to talk about these briefly on Tuesday. Please comment
>prior to that time on any questions, updates or comments. Thank you.
>
>John, if you have more comments, please send to the list.
>
>(See attached file: ebbp-quality-recommendations-draft-mm1-040105.doc)
>  
>

open-ebbp-quality-recommendations-draft-mm2-040505.doc