Re: NDD xpath element

[Martin Sachs <msachs@cyclonecommerce.com>]

Michael,

I believe that you are correct that both xpaths should be listed in the 
merged NDD.  I am looking forward to a response from the person on the team 
who is the NDD expert.

Regards,
Marty

At 03:52 AM 10/14/2003 -0700, Vetter, Michael wrote:
>Dear Marty
>
>I have another question about the CPA negotiation spec:
>
>There are cases in CPP/CPAs where the corresponding elements (e.g.
>attributes and children of CanSend - CanReceive) of both parties do not
>have the same xpath.
>Which of both xpaths should be listed in the NDD for the negotiation of
>a feature?
>
>If both paths were listed in the merged NDD then the negotiation
>component would not need to know about this relation.
>
>Best regards
>
>Michael Vetter
>________________________________________________________________________
>____
>
>         Dipl.-Inform. Michael Vetter
>         CC Electronic Business Integration
>         Fraunhofer IAO (Institut fuer Arbeitswirtschaft und
>Organisation)
>         mail:           Nobelstrasse 12, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
>         phone:  +49 (0) 711 970 2324
>         fax:            +49 (0) 711 970 5111
>         email:  Michael.Vetter@iao.fhg.de
>         www:          www.ebi.iao.fraunhofer.de
>________________________________________________________________________
>____

*************************************
Martin Sachs
standards architect
Cyclone Commerce
msachs@cyclonecommerce.com