[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Public Comment
Hi, The CPPA teleconference this week (Jan 23) is scheduled to discuss your issue. I personally believe that the schema is, in this case correct. However, the TC must establish a consensus on the issue and decide how to handle the apparent discrepancy. For example, we may decide to add an errata item (to be rolled up into the next version the TC approves). The minutes for this week may provide you with some info. We will also reply with on the comment list when the consensus resolution emerges. Thanks Dale Moberg -----Original Message----- From: comment-form@oasis-open.org [mailto:comment-form@oasis-open.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:09 AM To: ebxml-cppa-comment@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Public Comment Importance: Low Comment from: louise.peres@francetelecom.com Hi, I am studying ebXML and specially CPP and CPA. There is an differenece between the document ebCPP2_0.pdf and the schema cpp-cpa-2_0.xsd. line 668 about Certificate, it's written "one or more" line 771, about SecurityDetails, it's written "one or more". In the schema,in the PartyInfo definition, the elements Certificate and SecurityDetails have minOccurs="0". Best Regards Louise To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to ebxml-cppa-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org, or visit http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]