[ebxml-cppa-negot] Re: [ebxml-cppa] [ebxml-msg] authorizedRole

[bhaugen <linkage@interaccess.com>]

From: LONJON Antoine 
> I am not sure I am completly align with Bob's usage of the word "signal",
> but I agree that transactions should have only one objective/intent. In
> other words, transactions should only describe "one thing to be done".
> Offering is one thing, conter-offering is another one.

Forget the word I used in a casual message, and read
the negotiation pattern in http://www.ebxml.org/specs/bpPATT.pdf 
The idea is described somewhat more precisely there,
but it could be any one of several ways to declare in
a response that another transaction is coming up
with a counter-offer.

Otherwise, I completely agree with Antoine.

-Bob Haugen