[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa-negot] Message Content: outline
Jean, I finally managed to have a look at your negotiation messages proposal. Here are my points, mostly collecting open issues, not real suggestions: - Initiating Message: What is the purpose of the CPP IDs? Don't we expect the CPPs of the parties to be included in the CPA or CPA template, respetively? - To come back to last week's discussion: What is the unerlying state model of a CPA (proposed, rejected, etc.). I presume this needs to be clarified in the context of the negotiation process discussion. - On the signature and acceptance procedure: Do we assume that every proposal is signed? If we want both signatures on an accepted document, the first "Accept", containing the signed document, has to be replied to with a message containing the counter signature. Talk to you on Wednesday, Heiko ----- Heiko Ludwig, Dr. rer. pol. IBM TJ Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown, NY, 10598 hludwig@us.ibm.com, tel. +1 914 784 7160, mob. +1 646 236 9453 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hludwig/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC