[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: NDD xpath element
Thread-Topic: NDD xpath element
Thread-Index: AcNTFx/QAqr8+PRJRNaS4HuWpgdgKA5o2/mQ
X-XWall-Bayes: 32
From: "Vetter, Michael" <Michael.Vetter@iao.fhg.de>
To: Martin Sachs <msachs@cyclonecommerce.com>
Cc: "ebxml-cppa-comment@lists.oasis-open.org" <ebxml-cppa-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: NDD xpath element
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 03:52:01 -0700
X-Assembled-By: XWall v3.27
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2003 10:52:08.0693 (UTC) FILETIME=[36D47A50:01C39241]
Dear Marty
I have another question about the CPA negotiation spec:
There are cases in CPP/CPAs where the corresponding elements (e.g.
attributes and children of CanSend - CanReceive) of both parties do not
have the same xpath.
Which of both xpaths should be listed in the NDD for the negotiation of
a feature?
If both paths were listed in the merged NDD then the negotiation
component would not need to know about this relation.
Best regards
Michael Vetter
________________________________________________________________________
____
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Vetter
CC Electronic Business Integration
Fraunhofer IAO (Institut fuer Arbeitswirtschaft und
Organisation)
mail: Nobelstrasse 12, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
phone: +49 (0) 711 970 2324
fax: +49 (0) 711 970 5111
email: Michael.Vetter@iao.fhg.de
www: www.ebi.iao.fraunhofer.de
________________________________________________________________________
____
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]