RE: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Notes from BPSS/CPPA conference call

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

Dale,

It isn't clear to me from previous discussions that when more than one
application behind the same MSH uses the same BPSS instance document, the
different "BPSS instances" will have unique service names.  Do they all
have the same UUID or unique UUIDs in this case?
If the service names are the same in that case, it's OK as long as they are
qualified with the CPAId.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com> on 11/20/2001 06:44:17 PM

To:    Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>, dsmiley@mercator.com
cc:    ebtwg-bps@lists.ebtwg.org, ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:    RE: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Notes from BPSS/CPPA conference call



Dan Weinreb asked:

"It seems to me that this would mean that every message sent under the
control of a particular BPSS would have the same Service value.  That
is, all the messages sent by a given business process would all have
the same value for Service.  Is that what was intended?"


Yes, I think that is the current proposal under consideration.

This convention would be coupled with the
constraint that all distinct actions
within the BPSS instance would have
distinct names (both the short version
names and the long Xpath names
would be distinct within a "service")

So an OrderManagement service would
have PurchaseOrder ,  PurchaseOrderChange,
PurchaseOrderCancel, PurchaseOrderAcknowledge
actions, for example.



----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.ebtwg.org/ob/adm.pl>