Re: [ebxml-cppa] RE: CPPA-BPS interlock question

[Tony Weida <rweida@hotmail.com>]

The timeToPerform for a binary collaboration is covered by CPPA issue 19,
which was targeted for version 1.1 with the note "Consider override; Add to
implementers guide".  Thus its exact disposition for 1.1 remains TBD.

The timeToPerform for a business transaction activity is covered by CPPA
issue 18, which was targeted for version 2.0 (or later).

Regards,
Tony

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin W Sachs" <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>
To: "Hayes, Brian" <Brian.Hayes@Commerceone.com>
Cc: <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>; "Hayes, Brian"
<Brian.Hayes@Commerceone.com>; <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:53 AM
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] RE: CPPA-BPS interlock question


>
> Someone please add "override of value of BPSS timeToPerform" to the CPPA
> open issues list.  Can we get this in for V 1.1?
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
>
****************************************************************************
*********
>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
>
****************************************************************************
*********
>
>
>
> "Hayes, Brian" <Brian.Hayes@Commerceone.com> on 01/04/2002 10:57:28 AM
>
> To:    Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com,
>        "Hayes, Brian" <Brian.Hayes@Commerceone.com>
> cc:
> Subject:    RE: CPPA-BPS interlock question
>
>
>
> I agree that timeToPerfom should be overridable.  This is primarily a CPPA
> issue; obviously, the CPPA and BPSS must have the same semantics for
> timeToPerform.
>
> Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:09 AM
> To: dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com; Brian.Hayes@commerceone.com
> Subject: CPPA-BPS interlock question
>
>
> Someone at my lab has suggested that the value of timeToPerform should be
> able to be overridden in the CPA.  This would enable tailoring
> timeToPerform for the performance of different implementations. This makes
> sense to me.
>
> Is this alread on the interlock list?  If not, can it be added?
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
>
****************************************************************************
>
> *********
>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
>
****************************************************************************
>
> *********
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>