[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: v. 2.0 ebXML xsd schema directory
A couple of points. I'm glad that this was found. At the time of the ebXML 1.0 specs, (at least the time when the authoring was on-going) this didn't exist, hence the reference to an oasis-open.org URI. However, I just tried resolving the URI that Arvola would like to refrerence and I get a 403. I imagine that this is probably not desireable. Suggest instead that the URI referenced be: http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd Cheers, Chris Arvola Chan wrote: > Rich: > > I agree with your first point. > > With respect to your second point on referring to the canonical location > http://www.w2.org/2001/xml.xsd, I like to bring your attention to the > following excerpt from that schema: > > <xs:annotation> > <xs:documentation>In keeping with the XML Schema WG's standard versioning > policy, this schema document will persist at > http://www.w3.org/2001/03/xml.xsd. > At the date of issue it can also be found at > http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd. > The schema document at that URI may however change in the future, > in order to remain compatible with the latest version of XML Schema > itself. In other words, if the XML Schema namespace changes, the version > of this document at > http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd will change > accordingly; the version at > http://www.w3.org/2001/03/xml.xsd will not change. > </xs:documentation> > </xs:annotation> > > I think we should set the xsi:schemaLocation for the xml namespace to > http://www.w3.org/2001/03/xml.xsd. > > -Arvola > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com> > To: "Arvola Chan" <arvola@tibco.com> > Cc: <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>; <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:42 PM > Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: v. 2.0 ebXML xsd schema > directory > > > >>{I'm not a member of the CPPA list, so they won't see this :} >> >>According to the XML namespace standard [1], >>The prefix xml is by definition bound to the namespace name >>http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace. >>So the declaration is not required, but it might not be illegal to have >>it. I suggest *not* putting it, since it would cause folks to look >>twice and wonder if the prefix is being bound to it's non-default >>value. And it's easier to point buggy software to the URL that shows >>them where they're non-compliant. :) >> >>Also, according to the same spec [2] >>Prefixes beginning with the three-letter sequence x, m, l, in >>any case combination, are reserved for use by XML and >>XML-related specifications. >> >>It's not clear if defining The "xml" prefix to have its official value >>is allowed. :) >> >> >>>We can either replace the contents of >>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/xml-lang.xsd with >>> > the > >>>contents of the above file, or we can update our schema and examples to >>> > use > >>>the above URL as the schema location. I think it is simpler to do the >>>former. >>> >>Again, it would lead to some puzzled looks. I would refer to the >>official canonical location. >> >>/r$ >> >>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#nsc-NSDeclared >>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#xmlReserved >>-- >>Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, >>Encryption) >>http://www.zolera.com >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------- >>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC