----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:18
PM
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Re: CPP/A 1.06
draft
Tony:
Word is notorious with respect to its ability to assign
consistent line numbers. When I printed out the ebMS 2.0 spec, I could not
even get the on-screen and printed line numbers to match.
I suggest you post both a Word and a PDF version starting
with 1.06. Comments that identify specific line numbers should be based on the
PDF version.
I was going over the spec this morning in order to map out
my proposed changes. I notice that the descriptions for
ApplicationCertificateRef and ApplicationSecurityDetailsRef are rather
sketchy. I think we may need some elaboration from Peter and/or Dale. Since we
reached agreement on quite a number of issues assigned to Peter and Dale, I
think there will be changes from one or both of them for the 1.07
draft.
Assuming a schedule of 2/11 for 1.07 and 2/18 for 1.08, and
that we must have a TC approved specification to submit to Karl Best by March
1, it seems that 1.08 should be the one that TC members vote on. It may be too
late to wait for a 1.09 draft on 2/25.
Regards,
-Arvola
Hi Arvola,
Yes, I should be able to get it out fairly soon.
Most of the line numbers in Marty's 11 pages of comments didn't match
the Word document -- so I had to ask him for clarification and only
got it today.
Friday evening should be fine, assuming we continue
with the weekly pattern from before the F2F. Was there any discussion
of scheduling at the F2F? No one else has proposed changes for
1.07.
Thanks,
Tony
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:06
PM
Subject: CPP/A 1.06 draft
Hi Tony:
Will you be posting the 1.06 draft soon? I like to work
on my 1.07 contributions on top of the 1.06 draft. What is the
latest possible time for me to submit my 1.07 contributions?
Regards,
-Arvola