[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] CPP identification revisited
Forgot to send to the list. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* ---------------------- Forwarded by Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM on 02/11/2002 03:49 PM --------------------------- Martin W Sachs 02/11/2002 03:12 PM To: Tony Weida <rweida@hotmail.com> cc: From: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] CPP identification revisited (Document link: Martin W. Sachs) It would appear that if the CPP has a globally unique identifier, we would remove the statements about a registry-assigned identifier but it may not be that simple. Does anyone remember the arguments on this from last year? Duane if you are looking here, I think you were involved in the discussions. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* Tony Weida <rweida@hotmail.com> on 02/11/2002 02:20:35 PM To: CPPA <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org> cc: Subject: [ebxml-cppa] CPP identification revisited Now that CPPs have a REQUIRED cppid attribute, we may want to revisit text such as the following: NOTE: This specification makes the assumption that a CPP that has been registered in an ebXML or other Registry will be referenced by some Registry-assigned globally-unique identifier that MAY be used to distinguish among multiple CPPs belonging to the same Party. See Section 8.1for more information. Comments? Tony
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC