[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Packaging question
The Packaging element indirectly (through CompositeList, Composite, and Encapsulation) references one or more SimplePart elements. The NamespaceSupported element under SimplePart can occur 0 or more times to identify the namespaces associated with the corresponding body part. Instead of defining a distinct Packaging to be used with each requesting or responding business activity, is it possible to define a generic Packaging that can be used for multiple requesting and/or responding business activities? Can we interpret a Packaging which indirectly references only a single SimplePart and which does not have a NamespaceSupported sub-element as indicating that the schema associated with the BusinessDocument defined at the BPSS level is to be used? One feedback I got from my implementation team is that it seems rather cumbersome to create all the necessary Packaging elements, one for each action (corresponding to a requesting or responding business activity). It would be useful to have a shortcut for the default case (when arbitrary overrides are not necessary). -Arvola
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC