[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Analysis of assigned issues
Pallavi Malu 201,194,19 201, Duplicate sections for attributes/elements that reoccur <Martin W Sachs> Duplicate sections are unnecessary; it would be wise to remove any duplications for version 2.0 since duplications have the danger of getting out of sync. A simple section cross-reference should suffice when an element or attribute is used in more than one place. The disposition indicates "Ogden will check". Since I am not sure what to look for, I recommend finding out if Peter has checked. <Pallavi Malu> +1 194, Interpretation of confidentiality attribute in DeliveryChannel <Pallavi Malu> This has been discussed and resolved on the call last week. Resolution: Provide for an override in CPPA and defer to BPSS for the meaning. 19, BPSS timeToPerform for Binary Collaboration and related CPPA parameters: The BPSS defines timeToPerform for a binary collaboration. Should this be in the CPA (with number of retries and retry interval)? timeToPerform in a binary collaboration is the time to execute the full set of business <Pallavi Malu> At this point CPPA does not address attributes on Binary Collaboration, so far, everything from BPSS that we override is at the BusinessTransaction level.As discussed in the last F2F I recommend postponing this issue to 3.0 and add some text to clarify this point -Pallavi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC