[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: May 11, 2007 OASIS ebXML CPPA Teleconference Notes
May 11, 2007 OASIS ebXML
CPPA Teleconference Notes Attendance Monica Martin Regrets, both travelling Pim van der Eijk Agenda is located at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-cppa/200705/msg00001.html Webinar discussion omitted. Pete and Monica are overbooked for webinar
tasks that week, so Sacha, Dale and potentially a technology and business
expert with direct experience in a CPPA based community ramp environment will
cover webinar. So we headed directly into a second pass over the May 10 version of the
ebMS v 3 enhancement table (attached with notes and corrections made during
meeting). The focus in the second pass was to review the items marked “New”
and the proposals and discussions added in the May 10 draft by the editor. Id could be covered with no new items, just with some suggestions about
how to form identifiers of varying granularity to identity PModes. Still some
work to explain conventions. Consensus seemed to be to derive this value from
existing values and not make the conventions recommended and not mandatory. Some information items from the Business topic will be included in a
new DocExchange module; name is to be proposed when schema content model
created. Consensus favored the proposal to explore extending the
AccessAuthentication content model to handle usernames and passwords for wsse
usage. Pete brought up the problem of whether signature would be over
unencrypted values. Dale brought up the problem of how to allow validity check
of instance without decrypting. Both Pete and Dale will pursue seeing how this kind
of problem is solved elsewhere (if it has been). Dale proposed that signatures
be over encrypted values. Not certain whether that was agreed to, so need to
consider again. Dale will create a detailed complexType for the modified
AccessAuthentication and indicate where it can go. Also he will create the new
ebMS 3 DocExchange complexType. The last topic addressed the notify producer and consumer Boolean flags.
Everyone agreed that these values modify local MSH to application interaction.
Dale said that the kinds of interaction in place might be of interest to the
remote party, even though the interaction is a local matter (and no
configuration details are supplied). Monica pointed out how different these
features are from the normal collaboration configuration values at the core of
CPPA. Also, no matching is really needed between partners when forming a CPA
(or so it appears at present). Monica wondered how we could make this an
optional part of the CPPA. The topic was far from exhausted by the time everyone
had to move on to the next calls. Monica also mentioned that we should consider
how this complements or complicates BPSS signals (especially for exceptions). We
will have to consider that at future teleconferences.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]