OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-cppa message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] Updated chart on ebBP ebCPPA correspondence


Sorry not to respond earlier.

 

Yes, I think you have made a good observation and the proposal to add a DocumentEnvelope qualifier to the Action would be useful as needed.

 

I think I have noted that in ebBP when Sacha did the UBL-SBS project but it has not made it into our table.

 

 

Dale Moberg

 


From: Pim van der Eijk [mailto:pim.vandereijk@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 8:19 AM
To: 'ebxml-cppa'
Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] Updated chart on ebBP ebCPPA correspondence

 

Hello Dale,

 

One comment on the table. In the Responding Business Activity, there can be multiple DocumentEnvelope envelopes, which can express alternatives (e.g. "Order Accepted" and "Order Denied").

 

In Sacha's ebBP to CPA scripts for UBP (UBL business processes), the value of

 

ThisPartyActionBinding/@action

 

is set to be a concatenation of RespondingBusinessActivity/@name and DocumentEnvelope/@name so that the resulting Actions have unique names.

 

Pim

 


From: Moberg Dale [mailto:dmoberg@axway.com]
Sent: 21 August 2007 23:49
To: ebxml-cppa
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Updated chart on ebBP ebCPPA correspondence

The updated content for the ebBP 2 table is below. Attached to this message is the schema as of today that includes the changes to support this version. Trying to preserve CPPA v 2 instance compatibility and reusing the CollaborationActivity element led to some technical modifications in the current version. I will mention these in the August review. The editor’s draft will probably be sent out on Thursday to allow some organizational questions to be raised with TC on Friday. Editor’s draft is not complete with respect to editorial task list yet—probably a couple of weeks out.

 

A.   Correspondence Between CPPA and ebBP Versions 2.0 Parameters UPDATE NEEDED

 

 

ebBP (BPSS) Version 2.0

 

ebCPPA Version 3.0

 

 

 

 

ProcessSpecification/@uuid

ProcessSpecification/@uuid

Required

BusinessCollaboration/@name

BinaryCollaboration/@name

MultiPartyCollaboration/@name

Service

Recommended

(a potentially different value for each toplevel Collaboration)

BusinessCollaboration/Role/@name BinaryCollaboration/Role/@name

MultiPartyCollaboration/Role/@name

CollaborationRole/Role/@name

Required (Binary and MultiPartyCollaboration are deprecated.)

RequestingBusinessActivity/@name

ThisPartyActionBinding/@action

ActionBinding/@action

Recommended

RespondingBusinessActivity/@name

ThisPartyActionBinding/@action

ActionBinding/@action

Recommended

BusinessTransactionActivity/ RequestingParty/@name

ActionContext2/@role

Recommended

BusinessTransactionActivity/ RespondingParty/@name

 

ActionContext2/@role

Recommended

BusinessTransactionActivity/@name

 

ActionContext2/ @businessTransactionActivity

Recommended

CollaborationActivity/@name

ActionContext2/CollaborationLevel/@name

Recommended

ComplexBusinessTransactionActivity/ @name

ActionContext2/CollaborationLevel/@name

Recommended

ComplexBusinessTransactionActivity

ActionContext2/CollaborationLevel/ @collaborationLevelConstruct= ”ComplexBusinessTransactionActivity”

Recommended

CollaborationActivity

ActionContext2/CollaborationLevel/ @collaborationLevelConstruct= ”CollaborationActivity”

Recommended

 

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]