RE: [ebxml-iic-interop] Version 0.94 of ebXML MS 2.0 Conformance Test Suite

[Jacques Durand <JDurand@fsw.fujitsu.com>]

Mike:

 

That looks quite good. I think the content is fine.

 

I have the following editorial comments:

 

1. MSH acronym is used several times before being explained (in 1.8.2), we need to explain it the first time.

 

2. Sec 3.2.1: definition of "test coverage": should refer to "..no matching abstract test case" instead of talking of "executable test case".

 

3. Sec 3.3.2: needs better formatting (line breaks, color...)

 

4. Sec 3.3.3: explanation of the table structure not precise enough: "Abstract Message Content: a logical expression based on XPath notation that characterizes the content of the message either to be sent, or to be received." Also: more importantly: we need to explain what the $parameter notation is !!!

 

5. Section 3.4 "Executable Test Suite" should more explicitly announce the dependency on Test Framework 1.0 in the title:

something like: "Executable Test Suite using ebXML Test Framework 1.0" Also, given that this is really non-normative material

as far as teh ebMS conf test suite is concerned, I believe this section would be more appropriate after all the

abstract test material is described (i.e. after 3.5), instead of cutting in two the test suite. Could even be put in an Appendix. What do you think?

 

 

Cheers,

 

Jacques

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kass [mailto:michael.kass@nist.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Jacques Durand
Cc: ebXML IIC - interop list (E-mail)
Subject: Fw: [ebxml-iic-interop] Version 0.94 of ebXML MS 2.0 Conformance Test Suite

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Michael Kass

To: Jacques Durand ; ebXML IIC - interop list (E-mail)

Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 8:15 PM

Subject: [ebxml-iic-interop] Version 0.94 of ebXML MS 2.0 Conformance Test Suite

Jacque and all,

 

  Here's the latest conformance specification, with updates based upon input during conference calls,

plus Jacques suggestions.

 

  The changes include:

 

Jacques wording describing differences between Abstract vs. Executable test cases - section 3.3

 

Alignment  of  Test Requirements "Abstract Test Case Coverage" column (section 3.2.2) with

abstract test cases, and creation of abstract test cases where needed

 

Table showing alignment of Abstract with Executable Test Cases

 

Regards,

Mike

 

---

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-iic-interop/members/leave_workgroup.php.