[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-iic] Simple trading partner configuration for ebMS
Dale, Here you go, The schema and a sample is attached. I have to say that this schema came to be out of a perception that CPA is a bit too complex for the average user. My company has fully implemented CPA v2, so the design of CPA isn't really at issue. I've recently had to maintain 24+ CPAs, and I can tell you that it is a serious pain. Maybe this group could consider a Simple CPA schema, which is a subset of the full schema. I believe the docbook guys did this as well to try and make it easier to get users feet wet. 70/30 or even 60/40 is probably the kind of markup reduction I'm thinking of. Maybe schema modularization is the name of the game. You can decide. Regards, Matt
Attachment:
tpa.xsd
Description: application/text
Attachment:
tpaSample.xml
Description: application/text
On Friday, August 23, 2002, at 06:38 PM, Dale Moberg wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I skimmed the schema you provided. I guess it > is one of the "70/30" optimization gambits. > Anders from OpenEbXML has proposed a similar > lightweight schema within the JSR 157 group. > > As such, I think it might be worthwhile sending > to the ebxml CPPA TC for consideration. It > is especially interesting in that it might promote > adoption of profile/protocol-binding technologies, > because of its minimalisticYetEssential view of > configuring the b2b side of the MSH. > > So the advantage I see is that it is geared for the > ebXML MSH (it may ignore some of the PKI support > the security risk document recommended--I would > think about adding that in, at least optionally). > > A political problem is that it more or less dispenses with the BPSS > hooks (and so becomes choreography/flow/orchestration/process > independent). That may be feasible via the modularity doctrine, > however. > > Would you be willing to cross post the example and schema > to ebXML-CPPA? Maybe a few words in support of a CPA-lite > could accompany the post? > > Thanks, > Dale Moberg > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:matt@xmlglobal.com] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:07 PM > To: ebxml-iic@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ebxml-iic] Simple trading partner configuration for ebMS > > > Team, > > As we discussed during the F2F today, I've put together a simple CPA > replacement that has the bare minimum configuration information for 2 > parties. These could be what we use for specifying MSH configuration > for conformance and interoperability. It also could form a CPA > replacement, which is designed over time to meet vendor needs as per > discussions we had today (Myself, Hatem@IPNet, Jeff@Cyclone). > > If you're interested in this development for use beyond testing, please > help me out by supplying feedback -- is there anything missing that a > good MSH needs out of a TPA? > > Regards, > > Matt
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC