RE: [ebxml-iic] liaisons

[Thomas Bikeev <Bikeev@ean-int.org>]

Title: RE: [ebxml-iic] liaisons

Pete:
Do not hesitate to contact myself if I can help.

Kind regards,

Thomas Bikeev
EAN Interanational

-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Wenzel [mailto:pete@seebeyond.com]
Sent: 28 October 2002 17:37
To: ebxml-iic@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ebxml-iic] liaisons

I would be happy to act as liaison to RosettaNet, but may not have
enough contact with EAN to do that as effectively.

--Pete
Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>
SeeBeyond
Standards & Product Strategy
+1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)

Thus spoke Jacques Durand (JDurand@fsw.fujitsu.com) on Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:33:57PM -0700:
> All:
>
> We need to clarify our liaisons to various groups.
> We don't need to make it very formal, but cannot keep it too informal
> either...
> Notes:
> - there will be a primary liaison, but OK to have substitutes - or
> co-liaisons... and
> its OK to be [co-] liaison for several.
> - the liaison MUST follow what is going on in the other group, and
> inform IIC when worth it.
> - the [primary] liaison represents the two-way channel of communication
> between IIC and other group.
> - only the liaison (and the chair) can talk on behalf of IIC to the
> other group, after making sure
> this represents the opinion of IIC...
>
> Here is what I have so far:
> - CEN / eBES (Steve?)
> - OAG/NIST Testbed team: (Monica / Mike?)
> - freebXML (Matt)
> - ECOM (Iwasa?)
> - EAN and E-Centre (Pete?)
> - JMT (Monica)
> - ebXML Architecture group
> - RosettaNet (Pete?)
> - Other OASIS groups...
>
> please let us know your interest in liaising to these groups or others
> (on the IIC list).
> If there are more demand, we may have to vote for the "primary".
>
> Regards,
>
> jacques

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>