Re: [ebxml-iic] [Fwd: Durand 8/19/2004: Testing isIntelligibleCheckRequired]

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

> Durand: But what do you mean here:
> >...only if the message (not the business document) passes structured 
> or schema validation.
> The bus doc may of course be other than XML, but it seems important 
> that a Receipt
> also covers the validation of the business doc, if one wants it to 
> mean more than say an RM Ack... - or at least, shouldn't BPSS be more 
> explicit about distinguishing when
>
mm2: See the link referenced which clarifies. We wanted to effectively 
differentiate what happens in syntactic checking vs. application 
handover and processing that would include conditional constraints, 
business rules, etc. See <<<<<......>>>>>> below. Thanks.

> mm1: I provided this to Jacques late last week and it triggered more 
> investigation on my part (and the ebBP TC) because some of the 
> technical specification language was not as clear as it could have 
> been.  <<<<<See this thread from today regarding this attribute (which 
> basically is an additional syntactic check on message, business 
> document and document envelope): 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200408/msg00046.html. 
> Thanks.>>>>>