[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: T2 Minor Inconsistency in Section 12.2
Arvola, Unfortunately there are three different "versions" of version 1.0 in circulation: The copy approved on May 10, the slightly reformatted copy, and the more recent reformatted copy. Apparently the line numbering does not agree among them. Please re-post this comment, referring to the section number. Everyone, if you refer to line numbers, please be sure you are looking at the original approved version(labelled "normative document" on the ebXML web site). It would be safest always to include section numbers in your comments. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com> on 07/26/2001 07:14:26 PM To: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org> cc: Subject: T2 Minor Inconsistency in Section 12.2 Line 1978 talks about three areas of the CPA that have security definitions. This is followed by only two bullets. The first bullet says "The MSH is not responsible for any security specified at this level but may offer these services to the message sender". This seems contradictory. If the MSH offers these services, isn't it responsible for doing the necessary encryption and decryption? What does "not responsible for any security specified at this level" really mean? The second bullet refers to a Message section in the CPA. No such section can be found in the schema (Appendix D in the CPPA spec). -Arvola
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC