RE: Bug report for ebXML MS1.0

["Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>]

Iwasa

We discussed this once during the develoment of version 1.0 and agreed that
we would use Acknowledgment (without the extra 'e'). I think we should use
this consistently ... anyone disagree?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: iwasa [mailto:iwasa@fs.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 8:33 PM
To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Bug report for ebXML MS1.0


All,

Please put this problem on the issue list.

There are two kind of "Acknowledg(e)ment" in the spec.
And I remember this caused interoperability problem in the
POC. Because while one implementation was using "Acknowledgement",
other implementation was using "Acknowledgment".

The line number which are using:
"Acknowledgment" are :
Line # 125, 173, 386, 388, 629, 809, 828, 832, 1137, 1138, 1142,
         1152, 1156, 1157, 1161, 1167, 1169, 1174, 1180, 1229,
         1508, 1550, 1551, 1602, 1605, 1645, 1647, 1668, 1739,
         1751, 1766, 1768, 1777, 1782, 1783, 1820, 1823, 1840,
         1842, 1844, 1848, 1867, 1882, 2094, 2095, 2096, 2500,

"Acknowledgement" are :
Line#  130, 201, 830, 831, 915, 1140, 1171, 1172, 1741, 1742,
         1743, 1781, 1787, 1797, 1807, 1809, 1810, 1816, 1817,
         1819, 1850, 2499, 2960,

Iwasa, Fujitsu

----- Original Message -----
From: <ian.c.jones@bt.com>
To: <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 9:26 AM
Subject: Message Service 1.0 Amendements


> Colleagues,
>
> The period for errors, comments, amendments and clarification to the
> existing ebXML Message service Specification  Version 1.0 is now open and
> will close 12 Midnight (pacific Daylight time) Friday August 17.
>
> All comments etc. received by this time will be formally addressed
> and managed by the OASIS ebXML Messaging Technical Committee.  These
> comments will be considered for inclusion in a revised version (currently
> identified as version 1.1).  Any comments/issues raised prior to the issue
> of the specification which have not be addressed must be re submitted with
> reference to the existing version.  Comments submitted since the issue of
> the current version will be include in this comment period.
>
> When submitting comments it would be helpful if they are submitted
> singly to prevent interwoven threads of possibly unrelated comments
forming
> which are very difficult to follow and manage.
>
> Ian Jones
> E-Commerce Engineer
>
> PP E1B
> 84-85 Adam Street, Cardiff, CF24 2XF
> > *Tel:  +44 (0)29 2072 4063
> > * Fax: +44 (0)29 2045 8781
> Email: ian.c.jones@bt.com
>
> British Telecommunications plc
> Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
> Registered in England no. 1800000.
>
> This electronic message contains information from British
Telecommunications
> plc which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended
to
> be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not
> the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have
> received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone
or
> email (to the numbers or address above) immediately.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org