OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: T2 Issues


David,

You said the RefToMessageId in the MessageData identifies the message.  That's
OK with me.  We just don't say that anywhere.

Currently the RefToMessageId element (section 8.4.6.3) says it is used for Error
Messages and for Acknowledgement Messages and not for StatusRequest or
StatusResponse.  If it is also to be used for DeliveryReceipts, please add a
sentence or statement to that effect.  Everything else that uses RefToMessageId
is specified in that section (at least I think it is -- is there anything
else?).

Since there are no required elements in DeliveryReceipt, what does it mean if
this element is empty?  We should require something (timestamp).  If the
DeliveryReceipt is signed, we need to require a ds:Reference -- signing the
receipt doesn't mean anything without the MIC.  Maybe the ds:Reference should
always be REQUIRED?

Regards,

David Fischer
Drummond Group

-----Original Message-----
From: Burdett, David [mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:50 PM
To: 'David Fischer'; ebXML Msg
Cc: Ian. C. Jones (E-mail)
Subject: RE: T2 Issues


David you said ...

Don't you need RefToMessageId in the DeliveryReceipt?  How do you know which
message this is a Delivery Receipt for?  Need to add this sub-element.
(This
could be fixed by adding DeliveryReceipt to the list in MessageData, section
8.4.6.3, but I would prefer it as a REQUIRED sub-element of DeliveryReceipt
like
it is with StatusRequest & StatusResponse).

BTW... nothing seems to be required in the DeliveryReceipt.  What does it
mean
if it is empty?  Shouldn't we require at least a RefToMessageId and a
Timestamp?

>>> The RefToMessageId in the message header identifies the message for
which a Delivery Receipt is being given. I don't think you *need* another
unless I am missing something.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: David Fischer [mailto:david@drummondgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 9:54 AM
To: ebXML Msg
Cc: Burdett, David; Ian. C. Jones (E-mail)
Subject: T2 Issues


Sorry Ian, I can't keep sending these one at a time.

===Issue 1
The Example in section 8.5.3 (TraceHeaderList) does not have a
SOAP:actor=next.
This is a single hop so perhaps the example is correct; however, section 8.5
says SOAP:actor=next is REQUIRED.

===Issue 2
In the Example in section 8.5.4, Receiver needs a PartyId.

===Issue 3
Section 8.7 Via element, the id attribute should be optional but the third
paragraph says MUST contain.  Change "MUST contain" to "has" since the
description sections already say whether they are REQUIRED.

===Issue 4
Section 8.15.8 Delivery Receipt element

In the title DeliveryReciept should be one word.

===Issue 5
8.15.4 StatusRequest element

I don't think StatusRequest should be present with StatusResponse (add to
the
list)

===Issue 6
Section 8.11 Manifest element says:

It is RECOMMENDED that no payload data be present in the SOAP Body.

If it was, how would it be identified in the Manifest?  BizTalk uses a
Document
element (vs. an Attachment element) for this purpose.  We don't have
anything
equivalent that I can see.  I would rather take out this statement and
possibly
replace it with something like "All payload data MUST be carried by
Reference
(URI) or in an Attachment (CID)."

===Issue 7
In section 8.13 StatusResponse element, what does it mean if messageStatus
is
not present?  Does this need to be REQUIRED?

===Issue 8
Don't you need RefToMessageId in the DeliveryReceipt?  How do you know which
message this is a Delivery Receipt for?  Need to add this sub-element.
(This
could be fixed by adding DeliveryReceipt to the list in MessageData, section
8.4.6.3, but I would prefer it as a REQUIRED sub-element of DeliveryReceipt
like
it is with StatusRequest & StatusResponse).

BTW... nothing seems to be required in the DeliveryReceipt.  What does it
mean
if it is empty?  Shouldn't we require at least a RefToMessageId and a
Timestamp?


Regards,

David Fischer
Drummond Group.

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC