Colleen:
Here is some feedback on the V1.01 editorial changes:
- [ebMSREQ] may be an inappropriate reference. The document is not
among those that came out of the Vienna meeting and is probably
out of
date and not easily accessible. Any
suggestions from the group regarding how we point to original requirements
if this is no longer a valid document?
- Figure 7-1 is still not quite correct. The Header Container arrow
should
point to the rectangle enclosing SOAP-ENV:Header, not to
the one
enclosing SOAP-ENV:Envelope. There seems to be some disagreement here. The original
change request from Dan Weinreb indicated the header container arrow should
point to the MIME Part box, so that's how I revised it. Maybe we need
some further discussion on this one. (Issue #69: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200108/msg00162.html)
- There are minor problems in the signature example on page 60. The
backward slash towards the end of line 2279 should be a
forward
slash instead. The namespace declaration for the
dsig prefix on line
2282 is unnecessary. I'll fix.
- The eb:version="1.0" setting in the various examples should be updated
to eb:version="1.1". Yes.
- Line 1743 should say "an ErrorList element with the highest severity
attribute set to Error" to be consistent with line
1748. The intent is to say that an ErrorList
element should NEVER be present with a StatusRequest element, which makes
its severity attribute setting immaterial, so I believe this is okay as it
is unless we need to rework to add clarification. See line
1750-1752.
- One bullet should be added after line 1756: * a StatusRequest element.
See above comment.
Cheers,
Arvola
-----Original Message-----
From: Colleen Evans
<cevans@sonicsoftware.com>
To: ebXML Msg
<ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Monday, September 24, 2001
3:41 PM
Subject: revised-ebMS V1.01 Editorial changes
Based on today's TC call, there are a few changes required
to the
draft version I sent out earlier (ebMS V1.01 draft 21
Sep 2001).
The attached spec (ebMS V1.01 draft 24 Sep 2001)
includes those
modifications. The accompanying issues list
documents what evolved on
today's call, resulting in the
changes to the draft spec. Effected
issues are highlighted.
After Thursday's deadline for comment (9/27), I will accept
changes
in the document, and add the T1 modifications from
Ralph. Then we
can start the whole process over again next
week at the f2f with the
remaining issues.
Colleen
----------------------------------------------------------------
To
subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager:
<http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
--