OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] [Fwd: Re: W3C - Link report]


Where in our spec does this need to go?  Since we have voted, I don't feel like
we can change anything more than typo's.

The only place I can find any mention is at the beginning of Appendix A but we
don't actually use this anywhere.  I am still uncomfortable with the idea of use
it sometimes and don't use it sometimes.  If Company-A points to a url .xsd
which does not contain this declaration (and their parser is fine) and then
sends to Company-B who's parser chokes without this .xsd declaration, then we
have a problem.  I understand that the schema can be cached locally and modified
but that sounds like trouble to me.  If two MSHs point to the same url, then
that url should work the same in both cases.

David.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@sun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:01 AM
To: ebXML Msg
Subject: [ebxml-msg] [Fwd: Re: W3C - Link report]


FYI,

The resource has been fixed, and there should be no
problems accessing it (no more 403). I therefore recommend
that we use the URI http://www.w3.org/2001/03/xml.xsd
in our spec since that is the version that is guaranteed
not to change.

Cheers,

Chris

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: W3C - Link report
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 04:28:31 -0500
From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
To: chris.ferris@sun.com
CC: web-human@w3.org, ht@w3.org
References: <200201141845.NAA13588@www19.w3.org>

On Mon, Jan 14, 2002, chris.ferris@sun.com wrote:
 > Email:                       chris.ferris@sun.com
 > Originating URL:             http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd
 > Forbidden Page:                      http://www.w3.org/2001/03/xml.xsd
 > Comments:                    The schema document at the URI
http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd
indicates that the permanent URI of the current resource will be at the
forbidden URI address. It
would seem to me that the URI    http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd has incorrect
access control applied
  to it.  From the comments within the schema:  "In keeping with the XML Schema
WG's  standard
versioning policy, this schema  document will persist at
http://www.w3.org/2001/03/xml.xsd. At
the date of issue it can also be found at    http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd. The
schema document at
that URI may however  change in the future, in order to remain  compatible with
the latest version
of XML Schema itself.  In other words, if the XML Schema namespace changes, the
version of this
document  at    http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd  will change accordingly; the
version at
http://www.w3.org/2001/03/xml.xsd  will not change."

Fixed, thank you for your report!

Regards,

Dom
--
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C's Webmaster
mailto:dom@w3.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC