Re: [ebxml-msg] Issue 41: Acknowledgment/RefToMessageId element

[Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>]

+1

Doug Bunting wrote:

> This issue points to a fundamental and inconsistent change in the 2.0
> specification when compared with the 1.0 version.  We have previously agreed
> and documented in numerous locations that ebMS signals referencing a
> particular incoming message must be sent in a message that uses the
> MessageHeader/RefToMessageId element appropriately.
> 
> David has suggested this addition (which was not discussed by the group since
> I rejoined) supports bundling acknowledgements.  What makes acknowledgements
> special in this regard?  What about errors, responses to multiple message
> status requests, et cetera?
> 
> I recommend we remove this element, especially because it is required and
> would normally just duplicate the value appearing in
> MessageHeader/RefToMessageId.
> 
> thanx,
>     doug
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>