OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Issue 74: foreign namespace attributes


+1

David Fischer wrote:

> Arvola,
> 
>  
> 
> Allowing foreign attributes is not a change.  The statement/bullet "Any 
> other namespace-qualified attribute MAY be present" is in v1.0 under the 
> Reference element, section 8.11.3.  The v1.0 schema does not support 
> this although in v1.0, the schema is non-normative (as it should be in 
> v2.0 -- I have never seen a specification where code examples took 
> precedence over the words???).  In v1.0, the schema is an example.
> 
>  
> 
> You solution of:
> 
>  
> 
>    <anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/>
> 
>  
> 
> is probably correct.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  
> 
> David.
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Arvola Chan [mailto:arvola@tibco.com]
>     Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:26 PM
>     To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
>     Subject: [ebxml-msg] Issue 74: foreign namespace attributes
> 
>     I agree with David's addition of the anyAttribute construct back to
>     the headerExtension.grp and bodyExtension.grp attribute groups in
>     "Version 2.0 rev A". The namespace however is not quite correct. It
>     should be changed from
> 
>      
> 
>     <anyAttribute
>     namespace="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema-instance"
>     processContents="lax"/>
> 
>      
> 
>     to
> 
>      
> 
>     <anyAttribute namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>     processContents="lax"/>
> 
>      
> 
>     to correspond to the W3C Recommended verson of XML Schema. I think
>     the main purpose of this wildcard attribute is to allow for the
>     specification of an xsi:schemaLocation attribute for the foreign
>     namespace qualified wildcard elements that occur under a given ebXML
>     SOAP Header or SOAP Body extension element.
> 
>      
> 
>     I am not sure about the <anyAttribute processContents="lax">
>     definition under the Reference element. It is an attempt to make the
>     schema consistent with section 3.2.1 (Reference Element) section in
>     the spec which states: "Any other namespace-qualified attribute MAY
>     be present. A Receiving MSH MAY choose to ignore any foreign
>     namespace attributes other than those defined above."
> 
>      
> 
>     Such wildcard attributes without any namespace restriction has never
>     been used in any previous version of the ebMS schema. I think the
>     statement in section 3.2.1 allowing such wildcard attributes
>     constitutes a change that may have never been agreed by the team.
> 
>      
> 
>     I am attaching some communications I have had with David earlier.
> 
>      
> 
>     -Arvola
> 
>      
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject:
> 
> Re: Foreign NS qualified Attributes.
> From:
> 
> "Arvola Chan" <arvola@tibco.com>
> Date:
> 
> Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:04:06 -0600
> To:
> 
> "David Fischer" <david@drummondgroup.com>
> 
> 
> David:
> 
>  
> 
> Sorry for the delayed response. I was away from the office yesterday 
> afternoon.
> 
>  
> 
> Instead of what we used to have in draft-msg-header-00.xsd:
> 
>  
> 
>    <anyAttribute namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
> processContents="lax"/>
> 
>  
> 
> we can use something like
> 
>  
> 
>    <anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/>
> 
>  
> 
> Please note the following from http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0:
> 
>  
> 
> In contrast to an any <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#element-any> 
> element, anyAttribute 
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#element-anyAttribute> cannot 
> constrain the number of attributes that may appear in an element.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Arvola
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com
>     <mailto:david@drummondgroup.com>>
>     To: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com <mailto:arvola@tibco.com>>
>     Date: Monday, February 11, 2002 2:35 PM
>     Subject: RE: Foreign NS qualified Attributes.
> 
>     How do we add anyAttribute to the Reference element as specified in
>     3.2.1?
> 
>      
> 
>     David.
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Arvola Chan [mailto:arvola@tibco.com]
>         Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 2:14 PM
>         To: David Fischer
>         Subject: Re: Foreign NS qualified Attributes.
> 
>         David:
> 
>          
> 
>         This is directly related to issue #74 raised by Doug. Why don't
>         we discuss this on the ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
>         <mailto:ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org> alias and try to get it
>         resolved at next week's CC?
> 
>          
> 
>         Regards,
> 
>         -Arvola
> 
>             -----Original Message-----
>             From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com
>             <mailto:david@drummondgroup.com>>
>             To: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com <mailto:arvola@tibco.com>>
>             Date: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:57 AM
>             Subject: RE: Foreign NS qualified Attributes.
> 
>             Oh, are you saying this limits the wildcard attributes to
>             (nil, type, schemaLocation, noNamespaceSchemaLocation)
>             rather than any namespace qualified attribute?  I didn't
>             understand that.  Yes, I see why this might be too limiting. 
> 
>              
> 
>             This is certainly not what was meant by the bullet in
>             3.2.1.  As I remember the original intent, we wanted the
>             spec to be fully extensible on both elements and attributes. 
> 
>              
> 
>             Regards,
> 
>              
> 
>             David.
> 
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From: Arvola Chan [mailto:arvola@tibco.com]
>                 Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:43 AM
>                 To: David Fischer
>                 Subject: Re: Foreign NS qualified Attributes.
> 
>                 David:
> 
>                  
> 
>                 The Manifest element was defined as follows in
>                 draft-msg-header-00.xsd:
> 
>                  
> 
>                  <!-- MANIFEST -->
>                  <element name="Manifest">
>                   <complexType>
>                    <sequence>
>                     <element ref="tns:Reference" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>                     <any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"
>                 minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>                    </sequence>
>                    <attribute ref="tns:id"/>
>                    <attribute ref="tns:version"/>
>                    <anyAttribute
>                 namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>                 processContents="lax"/>
>                   </complexType>
>                  </element>
> 
>                  
> 
>                 Please notice that the namespace for the wildcard
>                 attribute was restricted to
>                 "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> 
>                  
> 
>                 It seems that the original intent (not explicitly stated
>                 in the specification) for having this attribute in the
>                 Reference element is because there is a wildcard
>                 sub-element under Reference and there is a potential
>                 need to specify a value for the xsi:schemaLocation
>                 attribute for the corresponding namespace. The same
>                 pattern also applied to the MessageHeader element
>                 originally, which had both a wildcard sub-element and a
>                 wildcard attribute restricted to the
>                 "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" namespace.
>                 (The current spec does not mention about any wildcard
>                 attribute being allowed under MessageHeader.)
> 
>                  
> 
>                 Doug pointed out that the xsi:schemaLocation could be
>                 set at the soap:Envelope, soap:Header levels. However, I
>                 now think that there may be a restriction that
>                 xsi:schemaLocation can occur only once in each of
>                 soap:Envelope and soap:Header (because attributes cannot
>                 be repeating), and we already have to specify
>                 xsi:schemaLocation for the soap and eb namespaces.
> 
>                  
> 
>                 Therefore, I think the correct fix may be to both update
>                 the spec and the schema to indicate that wherever we
>                 have a wildcard sub-element, there should also be an
>                 accompanying wildcard attribute with namespace
>                 restricted to
>                 "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance". The sole
>                 purpose of the wildcard attribute is to specify a schema
>                 location for the corresponding wildcard element. In
>                 practice, I think the recipient of an ebXML message that
>                 contain foreign namespaces should attempt to resolve
>                 those namespaces even if no schema location hints are
>                 provided in the message itself. Therefore, it is not
>                 clear to me if the schema hints are absolutely necessary.
> 
>                  
> 
>                 Regards,
> 
>                 -Arvola
> 
>                     -----Original Message-----
>                     From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com
>                     <mailto:david@drummondgroup.com>>
>                     To: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com
>                     <mailto:arvola@tibco.com>>
>                     Date: Monday, February 11, 2002 6:50 AM
>                     Subject: RE: Foreign NS qualified Attributes.
> 
>                     Arvola,
> 
>                      
> 
>                     We made what might be a significant change to some
>                     implementations, without consulting the group. 
>                     We're not supposed to make technical changes without
>                     approval.  From the beginning, we said this spec was
>                     supposed to be extensible, which is why this was in
>                     the spec.  We allow ##wildcards are every element,
>                     why not attributes?
> 
>                      
> 
>                     The only place I find where this is a *problem* in
>                     the spec is the last bullet in section 3.2.1 which
>                     says "Any other namespace-qualified attribute MAY be
>                     present".  Doug and Chris' have requested for a
>                     namespace attribute on Schema -- we could add
>                     anyAttribute there as well.
> 
>                      
> 
>                     If we make changes to the spec before submitting to
>                     OASIS, we should add anyAttribute to the
>                     headerExtension.grp and bodyExtension.grp so this
>                     will align with v1.0.  We should also add
>                     anyAttribute to Reference and, if the group
>                     approves, to the Schema element.
> 
>                      
> 
>                     Regards,
> 
>                      
> 
>                     David.
> 
>                         -----Original Message-----
>                         From: Arvola Chan [mailto:arvola@tibco.com]
>                         Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 5:01 PM
>                         To: David Fischer
>                         Subject: Re: Foreign NS qualified Attributes.
> 
>                         David:
> 
>                          
> 
>                         I did a search in the Draft Version 2.0 Message
>                         Service Specification but could not find any
>                         mention of wildcard attributes being allowed in
>                         the MessageHeader and the Manifest sections. In
>                         other words, I don't see any significant
>                         discrepancy between the specification in the
>                         schema. I did notice there is one occurrence of
>                         xsi:schemaLocation in one of the examples
>                         related to the eb:MessageHeader element on line
>                         1924 which would not pass schema validation. In
>                         that particular example, the same
>                         xsi:schemaLocation attribute is also indicated
>                         on the SOAP:Header element so it is really
>                         unnecessary to have the same attribute set on
>                         the child eb:MessageHeader element. 
> 
>                          
> 
>                         If you have determined that there is a real need
>                         for the wildcard attributes under MessageHeader
>                         and Manifest, then I think an issue should be
>                         added to the issue list and discussed during the
>                         issue resolution process.
> 
>                          
> 
>                         Regards,
> 
>                         -Arvola
> 
>                             ----- Original Message -----
> 
>                             From: David Fischer
>                             <mailto:david@drummondgroup.com>
> 
>                             To: Arvola Chan <mailto:arvola@tibco.com>
> 
>                             Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:04 PM
> 
>                             Subject: RE: Foreign NS qualified Attributes.
> 
> 
>                             We shouldn't have made this kind of a change
>                             without group approval.  I'm not sure what
>                             to do about it now.
> 
>                              
> 
>                             David.
> 
>                                 -----Original Message-----
>                                 From: Arvola Chan [mailto:arvola@tibco.com]
>                                 Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:01 PM
>                                 To: David Fischer
>                                 Subject: Re: Foreign NS qualified
>                                 Attributes.
> 
>                                 David:
> 
>                                  
> 
>                                 The removal of the two "anyAttribute"
>                                 lines from the schema was recommended by
>                                 Doug. Please see
> 
>                                  
> 
>                                 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200111/msg00324.html
> 
>                                  
> 
>                                 This change was incorporated into
>                                 draft-msg-header-05.xsd.
> 
>                                  
> 
>                                 Here are the relevant excerpts from
>                                 Doug's message:
> 
>                                  
> 
>                               * Including wildcard attributes in the
>                                 Schema Instance namespace on the
>                                 Manifest and MessageHeader would seem to
>                                 support adding the xsi:schemaLocation
>                                 attribute to those elements.  However,
>                                 we've defined 9 SOAP extensions and the
>                                 other 7 don't allow these attributes. 
>                                 The simplest thing would be to recommend
>                                 use of xsi:schemaLocation only on the
>                                 parent soap:Envelope, soap:Header and
>                                 soap:Body elements.  Next in
>                                 complication would be allowing
>                                 xsi:schemaLocation only for all our
>                                 extension elements and documenting that
>                                 option in the specification.  I'd prefer
>                                 to limit future extensibility to the
>                                 wildcard elements we've already
>                                 documented and should add to a few more
>                                 elements.
> 
>                               * 64 d [Remove the two anyAttribute cases.]
> 
>                                  
> 
>                                 -Arvola
> 
>                                     -----Original Message-----
>                                     From: David Fischer
>                                     <david@drummondgroup.com
>                                     <mailto:david@drummondgroup.com>>
>                                     To: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com
>                                     <mailto:arvola@tibco.com>>
>                                     Date: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:04 PM
>                                     Subject: Foreign NS qualified
>                                     Attributes.
> 
>                                     I notice that all the anyAttribute
>                                     lines have been removed from the
>                                     schema?  When and why did that
>                                     happen?  The spec still allows this
>                                     on the Manifest element.  We used to
>                                     allow it on every element?
> 
>                                      
> 
>                                     What happened?  Do you remember?
> 
>                                      
> 
>                                     Regards,
> 
>                                      
> 
>                                     David.
> 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC