[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Reliable Messaging question
Arvola:
My 2
cents on this:
-
Error message does not serve as an Ack. An illustration of this is that
duplicate messages have to be Acked anyway,
then
Error-notified, as described in the spec.
- From
an implementation perspective, it is easier to have the RM mechanism tuned only
on Acks, to detect timeouts.
- The
meaning of Ack - as I interpret it in the spec - is not
acknowledging that a message is "valid": just that it has been
received.
(and
that it has "minimum integrity" so that it can be identified as ebXML, with
ID...)
If
what I said is correct, it would be helpful to havea more explicit
statement about it in 2.0.
Jacques
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC