Re: [ebxml-msg] LZJU90 Compressed Encoding

[Matthew MacKenzie <matt@mac-kenzie.net>]

On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 11:05  AM, William J. Kammerer wrote:

> Sounds fascinating.  Let us know if you find out more.  But I would
> think it really isn't necessary anymore considering that ZIP is such a
> ubiquitous format - a BASE64 encoded ZIPped attachment serves the same
> purpose, doesn't it?

It serves the same purpose, but Base64 adds ~33% to the unencoded file 
size, plus the added CPU overhead of both decoding and unzipping.  I'm 
looking for something better.

Regards,

Matt