[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] a less technical Pull slide
I think this will be useful but
do have a few comments. On the security points, issues
with smtp or ftp based solutions might be discussed in a comparison (are you
considering a pull case using smtp push and pop pull?) (maybe also a contrast
with HTTP GET rest solution also?) But is it really a security contrast? Spam
is a nuisance and a waste of resources etc but to be a security threat it needs
to be more than spam (or is interference or denial of service the security
point?) Also since we did spend some
time on the “message store/queue” authorization problem, and it has been of
interest to end user review communities, I think you need to point out how the
messages for a SMB/SME company cannot be “pulled” down by “a bad (external) guy” The 3rd party
infrastructure point (message store in a VAN flavor) is probably worth
mentioning. But is it really a security point? From: Jacques Durand
[mailto:JDurand@us.fujitsu.com] (the slide from eTG deck was
too much focused on the Pull mechanism, not its rationale) |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]