RE: [ebxml-msg] Restructuring

[Moberg Dale <dmoberg@axway.com>]

The default channel behavior is not very constrained by the specification, nor are there a lot of rules about sharing a channel (multiple authorized partners). I think it would be permissible to distribute the same document to multiple authorized partners on the default channel. There is a remark about FIFO being recommended, but it is not mandated.  Bookkeeping for behavior of distributing, for example, a "request for quote" over a default channel would be implementation dependent, it seems to me. Do you see something specified that would prevent a request for quote from being distributed over a default MPC to numerous parties? Possibly such a use case could even be governed by an open authorization policy...



-----Original Message-----
From: Theo Kramer [mailto:theo@flame.co.za] 
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 6:12 AM
To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Restructuring

Yep - but resulting imo something that is less than limited, ie. once a message is retrieved from the default MPC it is gone whether or not it was retrieved by the intended party or not.

Perhaps a clarification/recommendation on that in the AS4 draft would suffice.

On 01 Jul 2011, at 3:01 PM, Pim van der Eijk wrote:

> 
> Well, as I understand it, Partner authorized_for Channel is
> an N * M relation. Channel used_for Pmode is an 1 * M
> relation.
> So multiple partners could be authorized to pull from the
> default MPC,  and different types of messages could be sent
> on it.
> 
> But I think the practical value of the default MPC (without
> extensions like sub-channels mentioned below) is limited. 
<snip>
-- 
Regards
Theo


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php