[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [egov-registry] eGov regrep
I this would provide a useful comparison. Let's do it. Regards Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Mattocks [mailto:carlmattocks@checkmi.com] > Sent: 11 June 2004 17:56 > To: Egov-Registry > Subject: Re: [egov-registry] eGov regrep > > > Paul et al : > Given that - > (1) the CCTS Registry specification is still embryonic > (2) use of a mapping to CCTS and then using CCRIM - can only be a > recommendation > > I propose we [show how to] map all the selected e-GMS metdata subset - > (a) directly to ebRIM (farrukh) > (b) to CCTS (carl supported by Duane) > > comments ??? > > carl > > > <quote who="Farrukh Najmi"> > > Paul Spencer wrote: > > > >>Maewyn, > >> > >>One thing we need to do for the registry pilot is to look at how to map > >> the > >>metadata that will be stored in the registry. I have looked at what I > >> think > >>we need to support, both in the proof of concept and the longer > term. The > >>attached describes this just for the e-GMS metadata set. Farrukh will > >> then > >>look at mapping this to the Registry Information Model. > >> > >> > > Hi Paul, > > > > As I understand it the document you posted identifies the subset of > > e-GMS data for us to focus on within the POC. > > Thanks for getting this step done. The mapping step requires us to > > decide between: > > > > a) mapping directly to ebRIM (probably ClassificationScheme) or > > > > b) mapping to CCTS and then using CCRIM to map to ebRIM > > > > As I understand based upon our email discussion, Carl is in favor of > > (b), you maybe in favor of (a), I am unsure yet but leaning towards (b) > > and we are waiting on Duane to weigh in on the mapping decision. > > > > If we do (a) then I volunteer to map to ebRIM > > If we do (b) then I believe Carl has volunteered to do mapping to CCTS. > > > > Can we get closure on the choice between mapping approach (a) and (b) in > > this thread? > > > > I can provie a sample direct ebRIM mapping for one term (say Audience) > > by tomorrow if it helps people decide between (a) and (b). Carl could > > you do same for mapping Audience to CCTS? Does this tactical step make > > sense? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Farrukh > > > > > > > > > -- > Carl Mattocks > > co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC > co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC > CEO CHECKMi > v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 > www.CHECKMi.com > Semantically Smart Compendiums > (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]