[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [egov] [Q] ebXML/Web Services sub-committee
John, I am confused about the work break down for the sub-committees: 1. Who would handle marketing questions? 2. Who would handle outreach questions? 3. Are there any provisions to insure that SME concerns are addressed? 4. How are regional issues identified and addressed? 5. Who would handle questions of building an e-Gov Ontology? 6. How will existing XML vocabularies be identified for consideration? 7. Who would build reference implementations? 8. Would there be any sub-committee concerned with acquiring founds or teaming with other organizations to build reference implementations? IMHO, ebXML has the potential to provide tremendous benefits for Gov organizations and their constituents. But, ebXML has suffered from a “If you build it they will come” mentality. My most fundamental question is will this effort engage Gov representatives and how? Is this just another standards effort or an technology advocacy effort? Can there be a combination of both standards identification and technology advocacy? I apologize if I my questions are redundant. But I can’t show my clients these documents and make the case there will be anything but potential long-term benefits. My clients need results in the short-term. They need quick wins to build momentum.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC