[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [egov] Proposed Infrastructure SC
I would propose one deliverable be an implementation/best practices guide for Governments to implement a metadata Registry for publishing and subsequent discovery of key metadata. My past experience with government registries has been very enlightening and I can see a clear value in delivering such a proposal. I woudl also argue that this may be a good first deliverable due to the amount of current interest in establishing a Registry centric concept of operations for many governments. I can flesh this idea out further if there is interest. Can we solicit comments from the governments participating on this list? Please give this idea a sanity check ;-) If it goes ahead, I would volunteer to get this started. The other candidate may be an architecture for using Registries within eGovernment to help guide implementations. As opposed to a technical architecture, this could be a reference architecture. Duane Nickull Eliot Christian wrote: > The following statement of Scope and Purpose for the proposed > Infrastructure Subcommittee incorporates suggestions of several > participants in the OASIS E-Government Technical Committee: > Owen Ambur, John Borras, Diane Lewis, Jim Rice, and Sinisa Zimek. > I hope that I have captured the intent of the suggestions, while > exercising some editorial license to maintain readability. Please > do let me know if you object to adoption of this statement. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Scope and Purpose: Within the scope of the E-Government Technical > Committee, the Infrastructure Subcommittee focuses on common > facilities applied in multiple government functions. Examples > of common facilities include Security and Authentication, > Privacy Assurance, Geospatial Facilities, Metadata Facilities, > E-forms Facilities, Identity Services, Interface Management, > Information Discovery, Records Management, Taxonomy Management, > Registry and Repository Facilities, and Organization Directories, > among others. Common facilities addressed by the Infrastructure > Subcommittee are component technology solutions used by the > various government functions delineated by the Services > Subcommittee and the various E-Government projects highlighted > by the Best Practices Subcommittee. Common facilities addressed > by the Infrastructure Subcommittee also make use of the technical > mechanisms addressed by the Interoperable Services Subcommittee, > which are independent of particular government functions or > common facilities. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Assuming that we are now close to consensus on the Scope > and Purpose statement of the Infrastructure Subcommittee, > please circulate any suggestions on specific Deliverables. > Each Deliverable should be described with a short paragraph > accompanied by an estimate of the expected level of effort > and time to completion. -- *************************************************** Yellow Dragon Software - http://www.yellowdragonsoft.com Professional Software Development & Metadata Management Project Team Lead - UN/CEFACT eBusiness Architecture
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]