[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: The Future of EML
In my recent work involving EML, it has been clear that the clarity and consistency of the specification are suffering badly from the effects of its continued evolution. Some years ago, I suggested building a proper data model, but this was turned down on cost grounds. Typical of the issues I am now finding is that the 330, which was originally intended to supply a list of electors for the purpose of voting, has evolved to cover most areas where such a list is required. For example, in the UK, it is being used to provide a list of electors to credit reference agencies. This means it is duplicating the 120 message, and I am being asked which should be used. If there is this confusion, it will lead to inconsistent implementations. Now I am being asked for similar features in the 230. It seems logical to remove the 120 and expand the 230, 330 and 630 to cover its functions. This is just one example. I believe that a thorough review of the schemas, including the development of a data model, would help clarify many points and help with consistency of implementation. Since the ISO process is not one to be taken lightly, I would like to see it done before submission. I currently worry about the feedback we will get if other experts look at the current version in detail. Why can't we just get on and do this work? Because, in spite of the presence on the TC of several large companies working in the multi-billion dollar voting industry, most of the technical work is being left to two individuals who receive no payment. Is it not time for some of the big companies either to allow some staff to work on this or put up some money so that the current volunteers can do a decent job? We should be able to get EML up to the standards of UBL and other specifications that have had significant resource thrown at them. If not, it reflects badly on the industry and will end up costing people more as interoperability becomes harder to manage. Regards Paul Spencer Director Boynings Consulting Ltd http://boynings.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]