OK I understand and agree your logic, but I doubt apart from
Paul who raised the issue of removing the 120 that we have much if any experience
of using it.
Paul – Is there anything in the 120 that we can remove in this
transition?
From: David RR Webber (XML)
[mailto:david@drrw.info]
Sent: 29 March 2009 16:37
To: John Borras
Cc: eml
Subject: RE: [election-services] Deprecating EML 120 for EML 330 in V6
Was hoping for input from the team first. People who are
using 120 and 330 and how they see this needs to be aligned. Things
change so we need a sanity check - on whether these should be
continued - I don't just want to blindly put things in without
understanding the role and purpose they then fulfil in the 330. If we can
simplify and rationalize then we should take this opportunity to do that.
-------- Original Message
--------
Subject: RE: [election-services] Deprecating EML 120 for EML 330 in V6
From: "John Borras" <john@pensive.eu>
Date: Sun, March 29, 2009 10:28 am
To: "David RR Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>
Cc: "eml " <election-services@lists.oasis-open.org>
The simple answer surely has to be, if there’s stuff in 120
that’s not in 330 then it needs to be added to the later before we can delete
the 120. We cannot afford to lose any data in this exercise as we
established way back that the 120 was a necessary process that had to be part
of EML. So unless I’m misunderstanding your question all the orange stuff
has to be added.
I assume all the orange stuff about addresses is the result of
your CIQ import, and that needs to be in 330.
I don’t see what your query is about the signature stuff – can
you be more explicit about which items are confusing you.
If you think we need a quick telecon to go through this, and
maybe other bits of V6, then let’s set that up.
Thanks for your efforts so far.
From: David
RR Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
Sent: 27 March 2009 19:18
To: eml
Subject: [election-services] Deprecating EML 120 for EML 330 in V6
Attached is a spreadsheet I autogenerated using CAM - comparing
the components of the 120 to the 330.
I have labelled those items in 120 that appear to not
be in the 330 in orange.
Can we sanity check these please? Seems like the signature
stuff may be something we need to resolve?
Is there anything else? If you want to provide feedback -
probably easiest is to edit the spreadsheet - and mark those items we need to
add to the 330 accordingly (green).
I've also included the EML 330 dictionary of the core components
CCTS - so you can further analysis what may already be in the 330 that can be
applied for the 120.
Once we have this all resolved - then I plan to remove the 120
from the V6.
|