Team,
OK - went back and reviewed everything and significantly improved the dictionary compare XSLT processing.
Adding in the 230 definately completes the other pieces of the puzzle.
Attached Excel spreadsheet.
I believe this shows we are very close - most items do indeed match as Paul thought.
Reviewing the 120 to combined worksheet - following suggestions:
- 178 - we add a Source node to 230 and 330 - that tracks original source of content.
I am seeing that the remaining items in the 120 relate to physical transfer of content - and hence are more of a "result report" that a batch process would produce - rather than something we should perscribe into the standard. Typically this would all be external to the EML - a results report - that a SQL or similar process e.g a DIFF) would produce.
Thoughts everyone?
Thanks, DW