Re: [election-services] Groups - Draft EML v6 with public comment edits and global consistency changes (EML-v6-May-2010.zip) uploaded

[Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall@berkeley.edu>]

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:36 AM, John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Just to clarify the procedure, the TC has to approve these changes as a revised Committee Draft and approve its release for a further Public Review.  Both steps require a Full Majority vote.  So when David has completed the new dictionary I will post the entire package and set up a ballot to cover both aspects.  Clearly if anyone wants to discuss any of these changes we should do that before I post the ballot so shout now please.

I haven't had a chance to look at the draft or the interim draft
(which I assume the draft supercedes). However, I need to reiterate
that the view from USA election metadata folks is that we need to
provide some minimal "hello, world!" examples of how we envision each
series to be used.  I don't think I'm close enough to the XML to
produce such a thing (although with one in had, I can attempt to
curate it).

best, Joe

-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
ACCURATE Postdoctoral Research Associate
UC Berkeley School of Information
Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
http://josephhall.org/