Item Number: #0000
Description
Action Item from CAP Profiles SC meeting of Oct 5th is to:
1) Review Section "2 CAP-AU Profile" of the attached Reference document (page 3 of 34);
2) Review the ALERT element and 13 Sub-Elements within the ALERT segment in Section 1.1 (pages 4 of 34 to 12 of 34).
3) Highlight any other issues that the SC should consider.
Responses to this action item should be posted on Kavi PRIOR TO next Profiles SC call scheduled on Oct 12th.
Post any proposed changes on Kavi either as revisions marks in a COPY of the reference document or as a simple list of changes in an email.
Owner: Mr. Greg Trott
Status: Open
Priority: High
Due Date: 13 Oct 2011
Comments
Mr. Greg Trott 2011-10-05 22:40 GMT
Please focus your reviews on the following issues:
1) Is the content appropriate for the Section / Element and each Sub-Element?
2) Are the Notes appropriate or are more Notes required?
3) Are the proposed examples correct in terms of content and syntax?
4) Is there anything else that should be added to each Sub-Element?
======================================
Reviewers should note the following:
a) The format of the CAP-AU Profile document leverages from the format used in the CAP-CP Profile, as it enables clarifying examples to be included alongside the Description and Note statements.
b) Content of the CAP-AU Profile document is a "first cut" attempt to collate information from requirements developed by the Australian CAP stakeholders, and applicable notes and directions from the existing CAP-CP and IPAWS Profile documents. The content extracted from the CAP-CP and IPAWS documents was considered appropriate for the Australian Profile and would probably apply generically to the CAP Profile developed for any other country, so it could be adopted as part of a future template for CAP Country Profiles.
c) Content of the CAP-AU document aims to avoid duplicating any notes or definitions already stated in the parent CAPv1.2 standard, in order to avoid the need to update the CAP-AU document (if possible) in response to any updates to the OASIS CAP standard.
d) The USE of 12 of the 13 ALERT Sub-Elements will match what is already stated in the OASIS CAPv1.2 standard. The
sub-element is different in that it's proposed USE is REQUIRED compared to the OASIS v1.2 standard that states OPTIONAL. The reason for the difference is because Australia seeks to explicitly identify that conformance is expected to the Australian Profile. This is the same approach as Canada has applied in CAP-CP.
4)
Referenced Items
![]()
DRAFT version 0.3 of CAP Australia Profile document (318K)
2011-09-05
Download | View Details
![]()
Map of CAP element USE intentions - CAPv1.2 versus CAP-AU (144K)
2011-09-14
Download | View Details