Re: [emergency-comment] CAP-v1.2.1.xsd proposal (was: Re:[emergency-comment] CAP-v1.2.xsd: why no global type definitions?)

[Jacob Westfall <jake@jpw.biz>]

> I'll not go too far but maybe the numbering within the CAP-project could  be adapted to 
> [major].[minor].[patch] and a new schema could be published by just increasing the patch
> number.

There is an errata process for OASIS specifications that would be similar to what you suggest.  However we'd have to first confirm if these schema changes would qualify, then go through this process.  If the TC decides to go forward with an errata in the future, we'll be sure to consider whether to include these changes as part of that errata.

-- 
Jacob Westfall <jake@jpw.biz>