[emergency-if] Re: [emergency-msg] EDXL-AT & Situational Awareness

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Yup.

I think we've learned enough to do a decent job of it now.

Cheers,
Rex

At 9:16 AM +1000 3/20/07, Renato Iannella wrote:
>On 17 Mar 2007, at 22:14, Rex Brooks wrote:
>
>>If at all possible, even if it means spending a lot of time in a 
>>crash project, we should build EDXL-RIM before or concurrently with 
>>any new specs. We need to get that EDXL-RIM sucker done yesterday!
>
>I think this is most critical at the moment.
>
>My feelings are that we currently haver 4 specs that, to some 
>extent, are incompatible.
>There is no "common framework" between them and no consistent mechanisms for
>describing areas, people, orgs, event types and value lists (etc).
>
>I would recommend to the TC that the EDX-RIM become the next priority item.
>
>And that all future specs (including updates to the current 4) be 
>based on the RIM.
>
>Cheers...  Renato Iannella
>NICTA


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309