Re: [emergency-if] Re: [emergency-msg] EDXL-AT & Situational Awareness

[Elysa Jones <ejones@warningsystems.com>]

I agree and will put it on the agenda for our next meeting.  Elysa

At 06:16 PM 3/19/2007, Renato Iannella wrote:

>On 17 Mar 2007, at 22:14, Rex Brooks wrote:
>
>>If at all possible, even if it means spending a lot of time in a
>>crash project, we should build EDXL-RIM before or concurrently with
>>any new specs. We need to get that EDXL-RIM sucker done yesterday!
>
>I think this is most critical at the moment.
>
>My feelings are that we currently haver 4 specs that, to some extent,
>are incompatible.
>There is no "common framework" between them and no consistent
>mechanisms for
>describing areas, people, orgs, event types and value lists (etc).
>
>I would recommend to the TC that the EDX-RIM become the next priority
>item.
>
>And that all future specs (including updates to the current 4) be
>based on the RIM.
>
>Cheers...  Renato Iannella
>NICTA
>
>
>