OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency-if message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [emergency-if] Infrastructure Meeting Today.


Title: Infrastructure Meeting Today.
Same policy as the OGC. I do not see any issues.
 
Cheers

Carl
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 8:10 AM
Subject: RE: [emergency-if] Infrastructure Meeting Today.

FYI…If you are referring to my videos being non-compliant with the OASIS IPR due to the copyright notice on the whiteboard, you are incorrect dur to Section 5.2 Subsection 1 of the OASIS IPR:

To the extent that a Contributor holds a copyright interest in its Contribution, such Contributor grants to OASIS a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide copyright license, with the right to directly and indirectly sublicense, to copy, publish, and distribute the Contribution in any way, and to prepare derivative works that are based on or incorporate all or part of the Contribution solely for the purpose of developing and promoting the OASIS Deliverable and enabling (subject to the rights of the owners of any Essential Claims) the implementation of the same by Licensees or Beneficiaries.

 

We have granted OASIS said copyright license by our signature of the IPR.  I checked with our legal department before posting.

 

-Don

Office: 315-838-2669

Cell: 703-595-9375

dmcgarry@mitre.org

 

From: David E. Ellis [mailto:dellis@sandia.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:57 AM
To: emergency-if@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [emergency-if] Infrastructure Meeting Today.

 

All;

I would like to use today’s meeting to prepare for the Face-to-Face next week.  I have attached a word document for consideration about the structure and use of EDXL-DE element with the Routing infrastructure.  This is really important because even after literally years of discussion, the DE is often thought of as Metadata for contents in a data storage repository or for display on COP like UCORE.   I would like to use the attached to explain.

The first thing which became obvious was this needed to have significant flexibility.  There were needs for:

1.      Unique message identity

2.      Distribution infrastructure

3.      Delivery Status

4.      Policy based adjudication between Social Structures

5.      Capability to hand off to other distribution systems and preserve Policy based routing.

6.      Subscription for Messages based on target Area.

7.      Ability to deliver Multiple Content Objects.

8.      Ability to deliver both XML and Non-XML content.

9.      Ability to describe Content Objects to determine specific application consumption needs

10.     Ability to extract key element needed for deliver decision from encrypted content.

11.     Ability to provide granular Willingness information at multiple levels. (content, content object and entire message)

I would also like to discuss the draft Hans has provided Also.  It can give us some topics to consider.

Jeff, I have a Lab inspection which will run right up to the start of the call.  Please take attendance and have the subcommittee discuss your minutes.  Please do not submit material which is not covered by the EM committee IPR rules. <<...>>

David E. Ellis

(505) 844-6697



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]