[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] EM TC Notifications, Methods and Messaging 09-16-03 Meeting Minutes
At 3:28 PM -0400 9/20/03, R. Allen Wyke wrote: >So they only plan on supporting CAP 1.0 then? They do not plan on >building their apps so they can support future versions of the standard? Don't know. As I understand it, these and various other folks are planning to deploy hardware in mass quantities. Those devices may or may not be reprogrammable once deployed. Anyway, if a standard doesn't provide some reasonable degree of stability, its going to be of fairly limited value. - Art PS - That's why we put the version number in the default namespace id... so folks can detect different versions and maintain backward compatibility if/when there's a next version. >On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 14:30, Art Botterell wrote: >> At 12:35 PM -0400 9/20/03, R. Allen Wyke wrote: >> >If they can't resolve a URI, how do they plan on validating the message >> >against a schema? >> >> Just speculating... but I imagine they could validate against a local >> cached schema... or even use a non-validating parser and handle any >> resulting data errors downstream in the application. We aren't >> always talking about what we normally think of as "computers" here... >> many CAP consumers will be embedded "thin" devices. >> >> Anyway, any consumer on a one-way link will have a problem with >> retrieving updates. My understanding is that that's precisely why >> the warning-systems industry is interested in a standard... because >> once they start deploying firmware in commercial quantities it won't >> be feasible for them to chase a moving-target schema. >> >> Certainly we're addressing a broader user community here than in some >> other OASIS projects. Still, supporting use of CAP over one-way >> channels has been one of our explicit requirements since the >> beginning. What I'm hearing here is feedback from users who care >> about that particular use case and aren't persuaded that we've met >> that requirement. >> >> - Art > > >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/members/leave_workgroup.php. >-- >R. Allen Wyke >Chair, Emergency Management TC >emtc@nc.rr.com >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emergency > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >roster of the OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]