OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] EM TC Notifications, Methods and Messaging 09-16-03 Meeting Minutes


At 3:28 PM -0400 9/20/03, R. Allen Wyke wrote:
>So they only plan on supporting CAP 1.0 then? They do not plan on
>building their apps so they can support future versions of the standard?

Don't know.  As I understand it, these and various other folks are 
planning to deploy hardware in mass quantities.  Those devices may or 
may not be reprogrammable once deployed.

Anyway, if a standard doesn't provide some reasonable degree of 
stability, its going to be of fairly limited value.

- Art

PS - That's why we put the version number in the default namespace 
id... so folks can detect different versions and maintain backward 
compatibility if/when there's a next version.


>On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 14:30, Art Botterell wrote:
>>  At 12:35 PM -0400 9/20/03, R. Allen Wyke wrote:
>>  >If they can't resolve a URI, how do they plan on validating the message
>>  >against a schema?
>>
>>  Just speculating... but I imagine they could validate against a local
>>  cached schema... or even use a non-validating parser and handle any
>>  resulting data errors downstream in the application.  We aren't
>>  always talking about what we normally think of as "computers" here...
>>  many CAP consumers will be embedded "thin" devices.
>>
>>  Anyway, any consumer on a one-way link will have a problem with
>>  retrieving updates.  My understanding is that that's precisely why
>>  the warning-systems industry is interested in a standard... because
>>  once they start deploying firmware in commercial quantities it won't
>>  be feasible for them to chase a moving-target schema.
>>
>>  Certainly we're addressing a broader user community here than in some
>>  other OASIS projects.  Still, supporting use of CAP over one-way
>>  channels has been one of our explicit requirements since the
>>  beginning.  What I'm hearing here is feedback from users who care
>>  about that particular use case and aren't persuaded that we've met
>>  that requirement.
>>
>>  - Art
>  >
>>  To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the 
>>roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>--
>R. Allen Wyke
>Chair, Emergency Management TC
>emtc@nc.rr.com
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emergency
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the 
>roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-msg/members/leave_workgroup.php.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]