[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SC Call Tuesday
Sounds like another pass through the ICS-201 object model may be in order... looking forward to our call at 12:30 Eastern 9:30 Pacific... 800-453-7412 passcode: 604776! - Art At 2:15 PM -0400 10/6/03, Walid Ramadan wrote: >I am no expert on ICS or UML, but her are my >comments on version2 of ICS201 Data Dictionary > >resourceId: why are we limiting the format for >this one? ICS instructions suggest a resource >ID may vary from a license plate or a vendor >name plus anything in between. > >I may be mis-reading this, but how can the >"resources" element be optional and the "asset" >element be required > >The ICS201 is a 4-page document, and therefore, >it must be maintained as such with all its >elements regardless of whether information is >available to go on all 4 pages. For example, in >a paper environment, you do not just take out >the resource page of the ICS201 just because you >do not need or have any resources, but rather >you include it blanc. I would like for our >object model to reflect that. In other word, >the recipient of the ICS201 should be able to >recognize that there were no resources needed. >Same applies to "location" and "position" in the >object model. > >The multiplicity for "organization", >"resources", "location" and "summary" in the >object model cannot all be "0Šn" simultaneously. >We need to capture that constraint., otherwise, >what is the point of filling the ICS201? > >In the data dictionary, the "objective" is >designated as "optional", but in the object >model, it is showing "1..n" multiplicity. Are >these two inconsistent? > >A time/date data element is missing under "action" under "summary" > >I am not sure I understand the "0Šn" >multiplicity between ics201 and incident data >elements. Is that implying that the same ICS201 >is used for multiple incidents? The purpose of >ICS201 is to provide a limited number of users >with information on the initial incident >response until the first operational period >begins > >We made some of the elements that we listed in >the data dictionary under "ics201" "Elements and >Sub-elements" mandatory, such as msgType, and >status. I believe that we agreed to reuse >particular set of elements from CAP that provide >for identification of the incident to which this >ICS is related. Are we trying to translate >ICS201 into a CAP message? > >Although designated as optional, the "contact" >element under "incident" Elements and >Sub-elements" is not necessary because that >information is already captured by other >mandatory data elements such as preparedName, >preparedPosition, and preparedAgency. > >I am not sure I understand under what >circumstances the incident element under >"incident" Elements and Sub-elements can have >more than one <organization> block. > >When it comes to the data element >"positionReports", the high level positions such >as those making up the Unified Command, >Officers, and Section Chiefs are pre-defined in >ICS201, although not necessarily deployed in >every incident. I think the data model should >capitalize on the fact that those positions are >well-defined. We can also extend that to all ICS >positions including task forces groups, etc. > >Walid > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Art Botterell [<mailto:acb@incident.com>mailto:acb@incident.com] >Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 6:58 PM >To: emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: [emergency-msg] Minutes from 9/30/03 call > > >NOTIFICATION METHODS AND MESSAGES SUBCOMMITTEE >Conference Call - 30 September 2003 - 12:30 PM EDT > >Attending: David Hall, Rex Brooks, Gary Ham, Jerry Weltman, Carl >Reed, Rob Torshon, Art Botterell > >- Rex recounted highlights of last week's TC meeting for the folks >who were unable to participate. > >- Art and others reported on the successful CAP-based demo event in >Washington last week. > >- David led a discussion of the status of the ICS-201 format. He has >incorporated various inputs (from Eliot and others) in version 2 of >the Data Dictionary. Rex volunteered to help David in casting the >format as an XML Schema. The group agreed that we would provide our >comments on the data dictionary in time for next week's call. (A >copy of the v2 Dictionary is attached for reference.) > >- Cathy Subatch is on sabbatical for the immediate future. We'll all >miss her detailed minutes and general organizational skills. > >- Rex mentioned special populations, and Art suggested that we might >want to consider how such groups might help champion CAP and other >interoperability standards that improve accessibility. > >- That led to a brief discussion of PR. Art reminded the group that >any press mention of OASIS or its processes should be coordinated >through the OASIS PR mechanism. > > - The call adjourned at 1:00 PM EDT. << File: >ICS_201_Data_Dictionary_v_2.doc >> << File: >ATT199327.txt >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]