[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Meeting Tomorrow? Agenda: Remaining work for CAP 1.1
As mentioned in my last post, we have been asked to finish up our recommendations for CAP 1.1 post public comment, so that a web ballot can be arranged to vote for moving CAP 1.1 to Committee Specification status, prior to completing the process to request an OASIS-wide approval vote. Because he has been handling the issues list and the changes to the specification, we should meet only if Art can be present in order to complete this work, so I am requesting an update to the list here on your availability, Art. We understand you have been traveling, and hope you are adjusting to the reduced humidity factor back here in the SF Bay Area and that you don't have to hop back east again before we can complete this task. We also thank you for the updated issues list you posted yesterday. Tomorrow is our normal meeting time, and it is also another one of those days with multiple meetings, workshops and assorted events, including the Collaborative Expedition Workshop #42, Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at NSF (2REL) Designing the DRM for Data Visibility: Building Sustainable Stewardship Practices Together http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ExpeditionWorkshop/DesigningTheDRM_DataVisibility_2005_07_19 I will be attending this meeting via telecom around our meeting if we have one. If we met our agenda will be to finish up the remaining issues, which I see from the list posted yesterday consists of issues: #6 - Jim Trawick, ComLabs - Section 3.2.2. - voiceText; #7 - Jim Trawick, ComLabs - Section 3.2.2. - shortText; #8 - Art Botterel, EM-Msg co chair - Section 3.2.1. - add "draft" to <status> element; #10 - Dr. Iannella, NICTA - Secrtion 3.2.1. - use URN v. URI for namespace; #11 - Elysa Jones, EM TC chair - Section 3.2.1. - add version number for CAP-version-number element; #12 - Elysa Jones, EM TC chair - Appendix C - propose update to version history I would have sworn that we either deferred #6 and #7 or else decided against it because it was redundant as content types that would be covered in EDXL, and approved #8, #10, #11, #12, but I don't see it in my notes, from which I owe the SC the minutes of our last meeting, during which Kon also thought we had dealt with #6 and #7, but perhaps we just thought we had because we had made up our own minds about it. I know I have done that on more than one occasion, (even when I was younger and smarter. ;^)) I will wait till we hear from Art on whether we meet at our regular time tomorrow. Ciao, Rex -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]