[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Minutes for Meeting 07-11-06
Hi Tim, That's exactly what we did. As you work through your backlog, you will get to the minutes for the meeting and see that we went through the first two messages and discovered several things that we changed and I think, provded that it doesn't take too long to get everyone caught back up to where we were, that we will be able to make much more progress this Thursday. Also Renato said he would have a whack at a schema for the first and possibly both of the first two messages, and if that checks out, too, then we will have a good basis for getting the next draft ready by the time of next TC meeting, two weeks from tomorrow. That will be the first time that we could bring it to the TC for a vote, if we get that far. While that isn't quite what our very aggressive schedule aimed for, we pretty much knew a schedule THAT aggressive was a bit unlikely to succeed. However, we will still be likely to have it ready mid-August. We might even be able to get it to OASIS in time for a mid-August start of a 60-day public comment review period. That's a bit dicey, but we should certainly have it ready by start of September. Cheers, Rex At 8:30 AM -0400 7/24/06, Tim Grapes wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm just back from vacation playing catch up. > >Maybe you have resolved this by now, but Rex's message below confuses me. >The objective was to take a message like "Request resource" (a column in the >spreadsheet) and run through all elements (rows) to define optionality for >that message. > >Thanks, > >Tim > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Aymond, Patti [mailto:Patti.Aymond@iem.com] >Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:19 PM >To: Rex Brooks; Renato Iannella; Emergency_Mgt_Msg_SC >Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Minutes for Meeting 07-11-06 > >Rex, > >O.K. I guess I misunderstood what the SC is trying to accomplish. I >thought that you had divvied up the message types to draft schemas. What >exactly are we doing with the elements for today's meeting? > >Patti > >Patti Iles Aymond, PhD >Senior Scientist, Research & Development >Innovative Emergency Management, Inc. >Managing Risk in a Complex World > >8555 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 100 >Baton Rouge, LA 70809 >(225) 952-8228 (phone) >(225) 952-8122 (fax) >-----Original Message----- >From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:15 PM >To: Aymond, Patti; Rex Brooks; Renato Iannella; Emergency_Mgt_Msg_SC >Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Minutes for Meeting 07-11-06 > >Yup, Patti, > >Sorry I didn't get to this earlier. I've been reorganizing, cleaning >and adding two desktops to my LAN, so I have spent most of the day >wishing someone would just shoot me and put me out of my misey. ;-) > >There are several message types that haven't been spoken for, most in >fact. I'm not sure if anyone took on Description, but as I was >scanning for at least one that was Mandatory, that's the one that >seemed most likely to have been skipped when folks called dibs in our >last meeting. The others that I think are probably most important >that I don't think have been scooped up are Jurisdiction, Quality and >Availability. > >Thanks, >Rex > >At 10:59 AM -0500 7/19/06, Aymond, Patti wrote: >>Are there some message types that are unassigned to have a schema >worked >>up for tomorrow's meeting? I can devote some time this afternoon to >>develop one or two. >> >>Patti >> >>Patti Iles Aymond, PhD >>Senior Scientist, Research & Development >>Innovative Emergency Management, Inc. >>Managing Risk in a Complex World >> >>8555 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 100 >>Baton Rouge, LA 70809 >>(225) 952-8228 (phone) >>(225) 952-8122 (fax) >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com] >>Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 10:07 PM >>To: Renato Iannella; Emergency_Mgt_Msg_SC >>Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] Minutes for Meeting 07-11-06 > > >>Thanks Renato, >> >>Will do. >> >>Cheers, >>Rex >> >>At 12:01 PM +1000 7/18/06, Renato Iannella wrote: >>>On 18 Jul 2006, at 01:27, Rex Brooks wrote: >>> >>>>2.EDXL_RM: We decided, as mentioned, to have the previously >>>>scheduled meeting for Thursday, JULY 20, even though it is out of >>>>synch with the new regular TC schedule following the July 4th >>>>schedule readjustment. >>>>3.L >>>>4.We will focus on making sure we are in agreement with using the >>>>Matrix of Message Type status as mandatory, optional, conditional, >>>>or undecided as the vehicle for moving forward. >>>>5.L >>>>6.We decided to ask that several members work up sample message >>>>schemata for review at the next meeting, Jlu 20th, with the >>>>objective that we be able to finish this draft with complete >>>>message schemata by July 28th in order to approve it for public >>>>comment in August. >>> >>>Hi, just a "heads-up", can you please make sure these documents are >>>posted 24 hrs before the >>>teleconference, so that southern hemisphere inhabitants can read >>>before the teleconf ;-) >>> >>>Cheers... Renato Iannella >>>National ICT Australia (NICTA) >>> >>> >>> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >- >>--- >>>This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain >>legally >>>privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, >>copy, >>>use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended >>>recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete >>both >>>messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer >virus, >>>data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or >>unauthorised >>>amendment. This notice should not be removed. >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >>>generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in >>OASIS >>>at: >>>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> >> >>-- >>Rex Brooks >>President, CEO >>Starbourne Communications Design >>GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison >>Berkeley, CA 94702 >>Tel: 510-849-2309 >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >>generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in >>OASIS >>at: >>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> >> >>IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE: >>http://www.ieminc.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html > > >-- >Rex Brooks >President, CEO >Starbourne Communications Design >GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison >Berkeley, CA 94702 >Tel: 510-849-2309 > >IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE: >http://www.ieminc.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS >at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 7/14/2006 > > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 7/21/2006 > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS >at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]